Structure for JIRA: Ideas

Thank you for visiting our feedback website! Feel free to vote or post your own ideas. Make sure you turn on the option to notify you about changes and comments in your account settings, so that you can stay updated about the progress of the ideas you’re interested in.

  1. I should be able to create a "Structure Template" and choose while creating a new structure

    I want to create a structure. When I go from the menu, it shows me a "Select Template" pop window, where it shows me below templates.
    1. Empty Structure
    2. Backlog Structure
    3. Agile Structure
    4. Gantt Chart
    5. Agile Gantt Chart

    I want to create a customized template so that whole of my organization product groups use the same, instead of re-inventing in their own way. This will help my organization to build a standardize look and feel of structure and create ease of navigation.

    Please do let me know, it there is already s solution to it. Else…

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. All for better organization of Quick Transformations

    Love the Quick Transformations, but usually have quite a few that are all listed on the toolbar such that it takes up space and can be difficult to find the one that I need at the time. Would love to be able to group them such that selecting the group provides a drop down style dialog in which I can select the desired filter.

    Thanks for the great plugin!

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Flag items in the structure

    Hello,
    I would like to be able to flag items in my structure tree view in the same way as I can on my JIRA Kanban board and JIRA Kanban backlog. The original Atlassian feature is described in https://support.atlassian.com/jira-software-cloud/docs/flag-an-issue/

    Jens

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Display structure board number

    Hi,
    It will be very useful if structure board number is also displayed along with Name, access, etc on the "manage structure" items such as "My", " Recent" etc. As structure noards can have very similar names, identifying them using numbers will be very easy.
    Or It can also display -Name (this is currently a hyperlink) and its URL (which contains the number) as a new column.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Allow scheduling effectors

    Having effectors that can take a formula and set the value to a field is great. What we are missing is the ability to schedule the effectors, so that they run every hour/day/week, which will enable us to have these "calculated" fields up-to-date without manual intervention

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Enable editing of fields that are not on the Edit screen

    We recently started to use both Structure Gantt and Effectors. Both seem very useful, but one of the main problems we have with them is the ability to edit the issues fields. In the Gantt we would like to edit the start and finish fields, which nobody uses apart from within the Gantt. In the Effector, we would like to edit a field that will normally be empty (no one will set it, but the Effector). However, we found out that we can't edit a field if it does not appear on the Edit screen of the issue. This is…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. sum up values on group level

    We use Jira for project controlling and have a hierarchy of different items which we display in Structure. We also use transformations like Group to group projects by location.
    What we are missing though is a feature to show sums on the group level. It could offer some sort of configuration feature to choose the level for which sums should be shown on the Group level.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Activate Automation Mode as the Default

    Hi,
    Transformations such as Filters and Sorts interfere with Automation Generators.
    When the user has clicked the Automation button to go into 'edit mode' - although they can still go into this mode when they do not have the edit generators permission - then Transformations are disabled, which is great!
    However, if the Structure has Automation Generators but a certain user has NOT gone into this mode, they can accidently (or do so without knowing the 'damage') apply Transformations, and mess up the Structure for other users.
    Proposed solution A:
    Rather than not being in 'edit mode' being the default,…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Color quick transformation buttons to allow faster identification and categories

    Currently, when you add a quick transformation the buttons are all white/clear. When you have a large number, it can be hard to find the transformation your looking for.

    With colors, you could create visual categories (i.e. groupings, component filters, label filters, etc) and the user can navigate to them much faster.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Show component info into (not yet existing) component item (as the grouper) in the structure view

    As the project component can be used for grouping (Group by Component/s) and it has some information (status, # of issues, lead, description, default assignee), it would be great that this information could be seem in the structure view, item details (when the component group is selected).

    Today, it is only showing in the Item Details window:

    No details

    No details are available for the selected item.

    Best regards,
    André

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Include "Epic Link" in Categories that are copied when adding issues

    The ability to add issues directly in structure is great. Especially when using the "Copy from" categories option to have a new ticket inherit a lot of values from another ticket. It would be REALLY useful to have "epic link" among the list of included fields that are copied. I've used the "required fields" workaround for other fields, but unfortunately "epic link" cannot be made required.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Conditional Highlighting Transformation

    Highlight attributes or rows in a structure board (bold, italic, font, color, background color) based on conditions. Visual queues which bring the eye to topics on a board which need special attention. Perhaps an extension of the Transformations capability (Filter Sort, Group, Extend and now Highlight) Highlight transformation accepts several of the same options as Filter transformation (JQL Query, S-JQL Query, Sprint, Text Query) and now an additional options. Highlight scope (attribute, row, row and children rows) and Highlight Type (Font, Bold, Italic, Color, background color)

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Integrate with zephyr for Jira

    Integrate with zephyr for Jira to be able to get the test execution and the linked defect related information into structures. Currently structures is able to show the Zephyr test case , but not the test execution status and the linked defects

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Show keyboard shortcuts more prominently

    The keyboard shortcuts looks great, however discoverability could be better. Even technically minded individuals in the majority do not go searching for keyboard shortcuts.

    Adoption of Structure may be more natural and frictionless if users were shown a permanent reference to keyboard shortcuts.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Ability to save and "Perspectives" or combined set of Structure, View, Enabled Quickfilters that you can save and share

    Users get overwhelmed with the number of options that they have to change the way they visualize the data in the structure.

    Currently we can share a perspective which is similar functionality to what is being requested. However we cannot keep a library of perspectives in the system the same way we have the Views. This would help provide users with a library of options based on what they intend to do (i.e. risk management, project prioritization, reporting, etc.)

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Set different views for folders

    Different folders in Structure may have different needs for columns/views, so it would be great to be able to define a view to use for each folder.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Add fixversion as non-issue hierarchy element

    For Release Planning, I group by fixVersion in my hierarchy. But Gantt shows the start-end dates as of rolling up the dates below the grouped items. And there are no "sync" with jira version's dates.

    I propose the ability to include a non-issue elementes, synced with Jira's fixVersions, for synced scheduling at version/release level. Or something similar.

    Thanks!

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Named perspectives

    This one is so obvious - I'm surprised I didn't find it already.
    Provide a feature to save a Named Perspective that is permanent (until deleted) and can be modified.

    This would 1000% improve the usefulness of perspective views for us. As it works now, there are two major issues with perspective links:
    1) When not used for awhile, the perspective gets deleted and users are confused when they load the link
    2) There is no way to update the perspective. For example, if we want to add, remove, or change the fields shown, there is no way to update…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Allow html (Jeditor) renderer for column type field

    If we add new column form issue field which use Jeditor renderer(html), than in Structure table we see html tags and not the same view like at issue view page

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4
  • Don't see your idea?

Structure for JIRA: Ideas

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base