The TP column provide icons with summarizing information. I miss this in the cloud version2 votes
If I select the quick filter 'Assigned To Me' the results still show the group hierarchy for items that have been filtered out.
I discovered that if items are grouped by Release (i.e. Fix Version) anywhere then the empty Release group will still appear even though I don't have assigned items.
This is also means that if the Release group is sitting several levels deep then all parent groupings will still appear.
Update: I also discovered that this happens with Epics too.1 vote
Thank you for the idea! Having this option unchecked by default for new Quick Filters would be a good improvement.
Show the [...] menu for an issue to allow standard features such as assign, workflow transistions etc as is done elsewhere in JIRA.1 vote
Use colour to show time remaining vs original estimate as in standard JIRA progress fields when using time for estimates1 vote
Thank you for the request.
Could you please clarify it a little bit and share your use case? Do you want this progress bar to be split on estimated, remaining and logged separately as in standard Jira On-Premise? Or what would you like to see in this column actually? How are you going to use it?
Currently, there are no indicators of how long will it take to show up a structure and the 'spinning wheel' is showing up to several minutes (while uploading/reindexing a large number of tickets.
The progress bar will help to determine that the 'work in progress' and there are no issues/hangs during this process.1 vote
When the count of a group of items is summed I would like the child tasks (i.e. subtasks) to be excluded from the count.1 vote
Thank you for the request! A column that could count only items on the next level (instead of all sub-items) would be a nice improvement.
I'm very pleased to see the addition of the Epic column. However, it presently is displayed with [Key]-[Epic Name].
It would be more useful to see it displayed as [Epic Name]-[Key], or at least the option to select between the two.1 vote
Have different permissions for the editing of values in columns and rearranging structure through drag and drop
Instead of having one Edit permission, divide it into 2 different ones. By doing this, users that can edit values in columns cannot rearrange issues in the structure by mistake with the drag and drop feature.
- Permissions to edit values in columns
- Permissions to rearrange items in structure under group by automation (Change Epic,Rank,etc)
Filtering a selected item should not cause its children to also be filtered. I tried filtering a selected item that had children and was expecting everything but the item and its children to be removed. However, applying the filter removed all child items, which essentially renders the filtering feature not very useful.1 vote
Add ability to edit name and rank of a Version/Release from within structure. Right now that's not possible and it's very inconvenient to navigate to the project in scope to make this edit.1 vote
Thank you for the idea!
I'd paste a screenshot here if I could. At the bottom of the pull-down under the Structure name, it says "Tools: Create Structure, Manage Structures. Manage Structures just takes you to a screen where you have the choice of configuring the structure, or opening the structure you just left (this is useless), or delete the structure. Why not put "Configure Structure" on the pull-down with Tools, Create, Structure, Manage Structures, and make the Manage Structures button take you to Manage All Structures? You should also put a filter box on the Manage Structures page so you could zero in on all structures with a specific string in the name.
I'd paste a screenshot here if I could. At the bottom of the pull-down under the Structure name, it says "Tools: Create Structure, Manage Structures. Manage Structures just takes you to a screen where you have the choice of configuring the structure, or opening the structure you just left (this is useless), or delete the structure. Why not put "Configure Structure" on the pull-down with Tools, Create, Structure, Manage Structures, and make the Manage Structures button take you to Manage All Structures? You should also put a filter box on the Manage Structures page so you could zero in on…1 vote
Thank you for the request, we have plans to improve this functionality in the future.
currently statuses in cloud version are sorted by their:
- Status category
- Project (global statuses are shown above)
- Status ID (field id?)
and as a Jira admin I'm unable to change the order.
In server/DC version this feature is much more usable and I'm able to change the order which has huge impact on how we use Structure in planning.
Cloud sort order documentation: https://wiki.almworks.com/display/strcloud/Sort+Order
Server/DC sort order documentation: https://wiki.almworks.com/display/structure/Sort+Order1 vote
Group by Labels is a useful feature, but has limited efficacy when there are too many labels.
Being able to limit grouping to a specific list of labels, would result in only those groups being displayed.1 vote
Thank you for the request!
I use this filter automation all the time in Structure on Server, sad to see it's not there on Cloud.1 vote
Hello, our organization is using Structure apps for our projects management. We just discovered, that in Jira DC/Server the Structure app has a feature called "effectors" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE1dSklL9D8 . Could you add this feature to the Jira Cloud Structure app? If there is any chance to raise the priority of this feature in your roadmap - it would be great!
This is one of the most important features for us.0 votes
- Don't see your idea?