Skip to content

Structure for JIRA: Ideas

Thank you for visiting our feedback website! Feel free to vote or post your own ideas. Make sure you turn on the option to notify you about changes and comments in your account settings, so that you can stay updated about the progress of the ideas you’re interested in.

384 results found

  1. Be able to print issues attributes summed over time

    As a user I would like to monitor the evolution over time of a numerical issue attribute value summed across issues and displayed it like ressource usage are displayed.

    Example : attribute cost of a story to monitor cashflow over time.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Improve Sandbox feature capabilities

    Latest version of sandbox with 3.0.1 is limited in its re-planning capabilities. Some changes require removing tasks and adding new tasks for change requests from Marketing. Need to add support for:

    Changing links between tasks
    Ability to add new tasks as a change requests and change linkage between resources
    Ability to remove tasks as a trade off for a change request
    Move tasks between groupings and relink with other tasks because of unexpected issues

    In all cases, most changes are to view how a change request or trade will effect a schedule before marketing and team commits to the changes.…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Allow multiple resource to work on one item

    As a user I would like to have more than one resource to work on a task, especially when doing macro planning and integration task that require multiple team to work together in one item.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Reduce the margin/padding of every row to increase the level of entries visible in the screen

    Gantt charts are a good tools to see the globality of the project at once.
    Having a layout mode like: compact/confortable would be very interesting to maximized the visible content while looking at the dependencies in the gantt chart.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Allow dependency linking to tasks not in the Gantt view

    When trying to create a new dependency link for an item by clicking on the little dot beside the item in Gantt view it would be beneficial to be able to link to items which are not visible in the Gantt view. This is especially useful when using transforms which may filter items from the view but you still want to link to the hidden items.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Distinguish between multiple extensions by color or symbol

    When using multiple extensions (for instance the link types "is blocked by" and "blocks") it would help a lot to have a way of showing why an issue in question is extended. Allowing each extender to have a background color on the items it adds, or a symbol next to the summary would be great.
    Example:
    An automated structure that inserts "type=epic and project=projectA"
    Extension 1: Extend with Linked Issues, type: Blocker, "is blocked by"
    Extension 2: Extend with Linked Issues, type: Blocker, "blocks"

    The extensions might be permanent or quick transformations. For each of them it would be nice…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Add ability to extend by JQL

    My use case is when Inserting a JQL
    for example: project in (projectname) And type = Epic
    I want to extend these epics.
    Using extend provide my a why to add all issues
    in_epic, the ability to add only some will be appriciate

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure Cloud  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Add ability to specify AND or OR between filters

    It would be very useful to be able to toggle OR or AND between filters

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Support Bulk edit for the Cloud version

    As per https://wiki.almworks.com/documentation/structure/latest/cloud/comparison-to-structure-for-jira-server-data-center-and-service-management-130884848.html the Bulk Edit feature is not available in the cloud version.
    Since we moved to JIRA-Cloud@Atlassian I am missing this feature a lot.
    Is there a roadmap to deliver this feature?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Content Marketing Services USA

    Persuasive phrases will bring personality to your website, blog, online business, or social page! We offer efficient content writing services that are tailored to the demands of your business and developed with a distinct creative flare. We're ready to provide you with the texts you need, whether you need SEO content writing services, social media content writing services, or any other type of copy.
    https://www.micrositsolutions.com/content-marketing-services-in-usa/

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Pages  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Allow Drag and Drop re-ordering Structure Cloud

    In Structure cloud, I cannot drag and drop items to re-order them. When is this on the product roadmap for release/?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi Domenic,

    Thanks for reaching out. There are already a couple of ways to drag and drop issues on Cloud:

    - If you have a manual hierarchy (a hierarchy that is built without generators): https://wiki.almworks.com/documentation/structure/latest/cloud/building-a-structure-manually-130881237.html

    - If you use a sort-by-rank generator, you can also use drag-and-drop to change Jira ranks: https://wiki.almworks.com/documentation/structure/latest/cloud/sort-generators-130882739.html

    Our Data Center version supports manual adjustments, did you by any chance mean this type of drag-and-drop? https://wiki.almworks.com/documentation/structure/latest/data-center-and-server/manual-adjustments-57934755.html

  12. Enable outer join on two filter outputs

    We frequently use excel's Mquery to find and resolve errors in our backlogs. Specifically because you can very quickly take a query and produce multiple filtered views to subsequently outer join them and find data mis-matches. The huge downside is you can't edit the items in excel, if Structures had this capability we would definitely use it over excel.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Add a View control option for quick transformations

    We are extensively using quick transformations as "one-button perspectives" on complex Structures. So e.g. we are providing transformations like "show risk issues only". What is hard for us to convey to our users is that clicking this transformation, they must (manually) switch to the View designed to see the right columns for risk issues. If we could have the possibility to tell Structure in the quick transformation settings that clicking a specific transformation would automatically change the View to a specific one, this would shift the magic for our users to the next level :-)

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Add description option to Structure Views

    It would be a better experience for our users to see the View creator´s description for Views (at least mouse hover info). We are using very complex Views that are not self explanatory

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. "Insert Generator Structure Inserter" for Cloud Version

    The "Insert Generator Structure Inserter" is available only for Data Center and Server version. Will be useful to be available for Cloud.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Multiple Notes columns

    Suggest having multiple Notes columns per structure rather than just the one. Currently, you can visually add > 1 Notes columns to a structure - but the contents of the 2nd Notes column - get overwritten by the 1st one.

    Thanks.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Place filters above column headings

    The filters section for a Structure should be placed above the column headings section. This allows the column headings to be directly above the content of the Structure rather than being separated by the filters as it is now. The current configuration is unintuitive and difficult to read.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure Cloud  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Add ability to Extend by Formula

    Grouping by the result of Formula is very robust - it is possible to produce literals as well as arrays.

    If it wolud be possible to Extend by Formula instead of the links and subtasks and Epics only, it would give the power of extending based on the content of the Jira ticket, which may contain i.e. fields with issue list.
    It would by possible to construct deep structures with issues not linked to other issues but having them listed in some fields.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Alerts/Warning where issues doesn't completed according to their related fixversion release date

    Alerts/Warning where issues doesn't completed according to their related fixversion release date

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Allow multiple slices to affect an item if they target different sections

    In the Gantt view, when using slices, it would be great if you could have "stacking" slices as long as they don't target the same section. For example, in one of my Structure views I have a slice that auto-configures Tasks to be Milestones if they have a date in a specific field. I also want to be able to color code all non-Epic items based on their status, which would be 4 other slices, but if I wanted to apply this to Milestone Tasks I would need to make 4 additional slices to accomplish that.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Structure for JIRA: Ideas

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base