Skip to content

Angell

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Angell shared this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Angell commented  · 

    Saw that 2.0 included your idea on this. This helps a lot for sure, but there is still a need to separate groups of structures based on a global attribute, not a current user's favorite etc.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Angell commented  · 

    As we continue to add more structures, we are now seeing a big need for this, as the "Manage Structures" list becomes unwieldy when you are loading a list of several hundred structures. Being able to organize structures in some hierarchy/group/tabs would be very welcome.

    Angell supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Angell shared this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Angell supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Angell commented  · 

    Yes, that would be a wonderful feature and would eliminate a blank column and empty real estate for issues without any attachments.

    Keep in mind that the "Images" column is serving its purpose well for image file types. This feature request really concerns things like pdfs/docs/xls.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Angell commented  · 

    Hi Igor,

    No, because my suggestion allows the user to quickly scroll through a list of issues and immediately see which tickets have attachments and which don't. Your suggestion requires a user to manually go through each issue in the list to see attachments.

    Your suggestion is better than nothing, but I also think it is a bit overkill when all I really want to do it view the attachment only.

    Maybe allow the user to hide certain sections of the full issue preview (so you only display the attachment section in the preview)?

    Angell shared this idea  · 
  5. 65 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Angell supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Angell commented  · 

    I agree, this is a big need for us.

Feedback and Knowledge Base