Skip to content

Structure for JIRA: Ideas

Thank you for visiting our feedback website! Feel free to vote or post your own ideas. Make sure you turn on the option to notify you about changes and comments in your account settings, so that you can stay updated about the progress of the ideas you’re interested in.

173 results found

  1. Named perspectives

    This one is so obvious - I'm surprised I didn't find it already.
    Provide a feature to save a Named Perspective that is permanent (until deleted) and can be modified.

    This would 1000% improve the usefulness of perspective views for us. As it works now, there are two major issues with perspective links:
    1) When not used for awhile, the perspective gets deleted and users are confused when they load the link
    2) There is no way to update the perspective. For example, if we want to add, remove, or change the fields shown, there is no way to update…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Show component info into (not yet existing) component item (as the grouper) in the structure view

    As the project component can be used for grouping (Group by Component/s) and it has some information (status, # of issues, lead, description, default assignee), it would be great that this information could be seem in the structure view, item details (when the component group is selected).

    Today, it is only showing in the Item Details window:

    No details

    No details are available for the selected item.

    Best regards,
    André

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. sum up values on group level

    We use Jira for project controlling and have a hierarchy of different items which we display in Structure. We also use transformations like Group to group projects by location.
    What we are missing though is a feature to show sums on the group level. It could offer some sort of configuration feature to choose the level for which sums should be shown on the Group level.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. All for better organization of Quick Transformations

    Love the Quick Transformations, but usually have quite a few that are all listed on the toolbar such that it takes up space and can be difficult to find the one that I need at the time. Would love to be able to group them such that selecting the group provides a drop down style dialog in which I can select the desired filter.

    Thanks for the great plugin!

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Filtering a selected item should not cause its children to also be filtered

    Filtering a selected item should not cause its children to also be filtered. I tried filtering a selected item that had children and was expecting everything but the item and its children to be removed. However, applying the filter removed all child items, which essentially renders the filtering feature not very useful.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Have different permissions for the editing of values in columns and rearranging structure through drag and drop

    Instead of having one Edit permission, divide it into 2 different ones. By doing this, users that can edit values in columns cannot rearrange issues in the structure by mistake with the drag and drop feature.

    • Permissions to edit values in columns
    • Permissions to rearrange items in structure under group by automation (Change Epic,Rank,etc)
    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Reverse the order of the Epic column string

    I'm very pleased to see the addition of the Epic column. However, it presently is displayed with [Key]-[Epic Name].

    It would be more useful to see it displayed as [Epic Name]-[Key], or at least the option to select between the two.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. support integration with qTest tool

    Add support for qTest tool.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Allow Drag and Drop re-ordering Structure Cloud

    In Structure cloud, I cannot drag and drop items to re-order them. When is this on the product roadmap for release/?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi Domenic,

    Thanks for reaching out. There are already a couple of ways to drag and drop issues on Cloud:

    - If you have a manual hierarchy (a hierarchy that is built without generators): https://wiki.almworks.com/documentation/structure/latest/cloud/building-a-structure-manually-130881237.html

    - If you use a sort-by-rank generator, you can also use drag-and-drop to change Jira ranks: https://wiki.almworks.com/documentation/structure/latest/cloud/sort-generators-130882739.html

    Our Data Center version supports manual adjustments, did you by any chance mean this type of drag-and-drop? https://wiki.almworks.com/documentation/structure/latest/data-center-and-server/manual-adjustments-57934755.html

  10. Manual adjustments to automated structures in cloud

    We want a structure where automation is used to fetch issues, but where we manually sort issues into a hierarchy of folders.
    It can be done using metadata for issues, but that has two drawbacks:
    1. It can be quite tedious to update metadata to get the issue into the right folder
    2. If someone "else" updates the metadata the issue will move immediately. We what to do the moving manually in status meetings/during grooming.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. custom row heights and the ability to export to ms word/view in web layout mode

    custom row heights and the ability to export to ms word/view in web layout mode

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Deselect Automation when Transformations Funnel Icon is selected

    When Automation is Clicked and you go to click the Transformation Funnel icon, I suggest unclicking the Automation so the Transformation Quick Filters are visible. Currently, when you click the Transformation Funnel Icon, you also have to unclick or deselect the Automation button for Transformations to become fully visible.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. 0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  Alexey Pegov responded

    Hi Steffen,

    can you be more specific, please? What kind of connectivity you wish to be implemented? What are your use cases?

    Thank you!

    Regards,
    Alexey

1 2 5 6 7 9 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Structure for JIRA: Ideas

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base