Skip to content

Anjali Gola

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 107 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anjali Gola supported this idea  · 
  2. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anjali Gola supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anjali Gola commented  · 

    +1 We have teams that use a variety of link types. While we can try to drive standardization, we have found this is not easy. If it is not possible to add 'all link types' ... it should be possible to add 'top lik types'. We have shortlisted five link types that are most frequently used and have an internal official recommendation. These are : The four defaults (clones, relates, duplicates, blocks) + includes. We are considering parent/child instead of includes. If an extender would just capture these five different types that would cover a bulk of situation.

    The way to configure this could be that for each link type a certain flag could be turned on to make it show in the 'extend with linked issues of special link types'.

Feedback and Knowledge Base