112 results found

1. Change status sort order by their position on the statuses page

   Hi,

   currently statuses in cloud version are sorted by their:

   1. Status category
   2. Project (global statuses are shown above)
   3. Status ID (field id?)

   and as a Jira admin I'm unable to change the order.

   In server/DC version this feature is much more usable and I'm able to change the order which has huge impact on how we use Structure in planning.

   Cloud sort order documentation: https://wiki.almworks.com/display/strcloud/Sort+Order

   Server/DC sort order documentation: https://wiki.almworks.com/display/structure/Sort+Order

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   accepted  ·  2 comments  ·  Structure Cloud  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Track a chain of linked issues

   You want to track a chain of linked (dependent) issues through a large structure. It would be useful to highlight predecessors and succesors of a given issue by issue link using, for example, colors.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   accepted  ·  0 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Add "Configure Structure" to Tools in the Structures pull-down in Structure Cloud

   I'd paste a screenshot here if I could. At the bottom of the pull-down under the Structure name, it says "Tools: Create Structure, Manage Structures. Manage Structures just takes you to a screen where you have the choice of configuring the structure, or opening the structure you just left (this is useless), or delete the structure. Why not put "Configure Structure" on the pull-down with Tools, Create, Structure, Manage Structures, and make the Manage Structures button take you to Manage All Structures? You should also put a filter box on the Manage Structures page so you could zero in on all structures with a specific string in the name.

   I'd paste a screenshot here if I could. At the bottom of the pull-down under the Structure name, it says "Tools: Create Structure, Manage Structures. Manage Structures just takes you to a screen where you have the choice of configuring the structure, or opening the structure you just left (this is useless), or delete the structure. Why not put "Configure Structure" on the pull-down with Tools, Create, Structure, Manage Structures, and make the Manage Structures button take you to Manage All Structures? You should also put a filter box on the Manage Structures page so you could zero in on… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Structure Cloud  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   accepted  ·  AdminKonstantin Virolainen (Product Manager, ALM Works) responded

   Thank you for the request, we have plans to improve this functionality in the future.

4. Add ability to edit name and rank of Version/Release

   Add ability to edit name and rank of a Version/Release from within structure. Right now that's not possible and it's very inconvenient to navigate to the project in scope to make this edit.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Structure Cloud  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   accepted  ·  AdminKonstantin Virolainen (Product Manager, ALM Works) responded

   Thank you for the idea!

5. Quick Filters should not show empty groups when items have been filtered

   If I select the quick filter 'Assigned To Me' the results still show the group hierarchy for items that have been filtered out.

   I discovered that if items are grouped by Release (i.e. Fix Version) anywhere then the empty Release group will still appear even though I don't have assigned items.

   This is also means that if the Release group is sitting several levels deep then all parent groupings will still appear.

   Update: I also discovered that this happens with Epics too.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Structure Cloud  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   accepted  ·  AdminKonstantin Virolainen (Product Manager, ALM Works) responded

   Hello Alex,

   Thank you for the idea! Having this option unchecked by default for new Quick Filters would be a good improvement.

6. Add ability to not count child items

   When the count of a group of items is summed I would like the child tasks (i.e. subtasks) to be excluded from the count.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Structure Cloud  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   accepted  ·  AdminKonstantin Virolainen (Product Manager, ALM Works) responded

   Thank you for the request! A column that could count only items on the next level (instead of all sub-items) would be a nice improvement.

7. Posibillity to shift more issues at once in the timeline

   Our organization would like to have a feature which would let us to move few issues at once. F.e.:
   Epic has issues inside. So if I move the Epic bar, all those issues inside epic would move the same. Like in Jira's Advanced Roadmaps

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   accepted  ·  AdminViacheslav Ermolaev (ALM Works, ALM Works) responded

   Thank you for your suggestion. This feature is frequently requested, and we hope to start working on it soon. If there’s something we can help you with, fell free to ask.

8. Add ability to specify AND or OR between filters

   It would be very useful to be able to toggle OR or AND between filters

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Structure Cloud  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   accepted  ·  AdminKonstantin Virolainen (Product Manager, ALM Works) responded

   Hi Aliosha,

   
   

   Thank you for your request!

9. "Insert Generator Structure Inserter" for Cloud Version

   The "Insert Generator Structure Inserter" is available only for Data Center and Server version. Will be useful to be available for Cloud.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Structure Cloud  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   accepted  ·  AdminKonstantin Virolainen (Product Manager, ALM Works) responded

   Thank you for your request!

10. Show native JIRA Screens when creating and/or editing tasks in the structure view

    I really appreciate the ability to edit tasks directly in the structure view. However, doing so results in two undesired side effects:

    1. If the user needs to change multiple fields, they have to do so one field at a time. Depending on the notification scheme, this can result in a lot of email spam.

    2. It encourages users to change fields on the issues without entering associated comments. For example, if somebody is changing the Fix Version/s for a task, in our team, we expect them to enter a comment explaining/justifying the change. There is no way to enter a comment for an associated change when the change is done directly in the structure.

    The first issue is particularly a problem when creating an issue. Structure's issue creation window only allows the user to populate a couple of fields (or copy fields from other issues, which is often not what we want). It would be really nice if Structure popped up the native JIRA Create Issue window so that the user could populate all of the needed fields in one go.

    For changes to other fields, it would be nice if structure popped up a little window which allowed the user to change the field and enter an associated comment.

    I really appreciate the ability to edit tasks directly in the structure view. However, doing so results in two undesired side effects:

    1. If the user needs to change multiple fields, they have to do so one field at a time. Depending on the notification scheme, this can result in a lot of email spam.

    2. It encourages users to change fields on the issues without entering associated comments. For example, if somebody is changing the Fix Version/s for a task, in our team, we expect them to enter a comment explaining/justifying the change. There is no way to enter a comment… more

    0 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    accepted  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Support wildcard in structure() S-JQL function

    I would like a way to use a 'wildcard' in the structure() S-JQL function so that it searches all matching structures. Specifically, I am trying to solve the following problem: find all leaf nodes in any structure.

    Here's a potential use-case: I want to have a task backlog implemented in Structure. I also want to be able to organize my tasks in a hierarchical manner, also using Structure. In my task backlog, I only want to track the 'leaf' tasks which appear in my hierarchical structure.

    I know I can do this now using the structure() function, but I must provide a specific structure name. Requiring a structure name makes it difficult to write a general building block filter since the structure() function is always linked to a specific structure.

    I would like a way to use a 'wildcard' in the structure() S-JQL function so that it searches all matching structures. Specifically, I am trying to solve the following problem: find all leaf nodes in any structure.

    Here's a potential use-case: I want to have a task backlog implemented in Structure. I also want to be able to organize my tasks in a hierarchical manner, also using Structure. In my task backlog, I only want to track the 'leaf' tasks which appear in my hierarchical structure.

    I know I can do this now using the structure() function, but I must… more

    0 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    accepted  ·  AdminIgor Sereda (CEO / Founder, ALM Works) responded

    also tracked as https://jira.almworks.com/browse/HJ-1365

12. Import quick filters from one structure to another

    Allow users to import quick filters from one structure to another; similarly to how settings can now be imported from one Gantt chart to another.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structure Cloud  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    accepted  ·  AdminKonstantin Virolainen (Product Manager, ALM Works) responded

    Hi Kristijonas,

    
    

    Thank you for the request!