Skip to content

Structure for JIRA: Ideas

Thank you for visiting our feedback website! Feel free to vote or post your own ideas. Make sure you turn on the option to notify you about changes and comments in your account settings, so that you can stay updated about the progress of the ideas you’re interested in.

158 results found

  1. group by date range

    I would like to be able to group by 'due date' ranges. This would allow me to group tasks by milestones. In my case I would like to be able to group by quarter.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Add tooltips to show complete field content

    I would like to be able to see, for example, the complete name of an issue in a tooltip because sometimes the width of a column is not enough to show the whole content of a field.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Toggle to expand or collapse all

    It would save time if there was the option to expand or collapse all in the JIRA structure.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Show values for field "Issue type" now it shows only pics

    Some times you have different names for issue types but they have one shared pic or it is 20 issue types in project. When we build a structure we want to know what is a issue type for an issue (how it names).

    Now it shows only pics. We tested "translation" for issue types, thaought the problem may be in it, but the test showed that it does not depend on "Translation".

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Gantt resource view should better callout what the numbers mean

    So lets say that I'm new to Structure.Gantt.

    When I see the resource view, I see a bunch of numbers for each resource line item. Of course I can assume that these are the hours allocated to each individual on a daily basis, but there is no indication of that being the case without playing with the Gantt chart, which effects others tasks.

    It may seem like such a minor thing, but for people who are new to resource planning or have experienced resource planning in other tools understanding what those numbers mean is important.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Enhance Visuals

    Enhance the visualization by adding the possibility to group tasks by boxing them. The grouping effect should be configurable per issue type (color and on/off)

    Only 7 Days available...

    https://exd-prod1.bmw.com/exd/exd.jsf?dir=until_2018-02-18_c0cedb98c89fb05a3faec33019bb3e529c639f2db2b24f3c6c422a28a0edc33c95e69ce31701

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Documentation Update - How to create a new Formula Column

    The Structure 4.5 documentation doesn't identify how to create a NEW Formula Column.
    https://wiki.almworks.com/display/structure/Formula+Column

    Step 1 should identify how to add a new field, not how to write the formula.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Horizontal scrollbar in structures and views

    If the view has many columns it is very hard to see what the values in the columns are. Horizontal scroll-bar is needed.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Multiple parents within same structure

    Allow an issue to have multiple parents within the same structure. My teams use JIRA to manage their messy hierarchies of requirements (vision, needs, goals, objectives, requirements, desirements, stories of all kinds, tasks, epics, bugs,... We make them all the same JIRA issue type "Requirement."). Often the same requirement "elaborates" multiple higher level requirements, so the hierarchy is messy. We have been using a custom link type of "elaborates"/"elaborated by" to represent all the requirements in the hierarchy, but it is difficult to see and manage when the messy hierarchy has many levels and issues.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Show linked subtasks in Structure for Cloud

    Currently Subtasks to issues cannot be displayed in Structure for cloud. It would be great to see these imported into the structure and displayed

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Resource Leveling Options

    Allow Gantt bars to consider an issue's "Remaining Estimate" value when computing the resource usage. Currently, we have issues with a start and end date, and are using time tracking which keeps track of "Remaining Estimate".

    But the Gantt bars are allocating by default, the value of "1.0". So the quadrant for resource usage is computing a total resource need that is assuming everyone is allocated 1 full day for every assignment. If an assignee has 8 things going on in a given day, it's reporting 64 hours need by that person per day! If instead the resource usage would…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Gantt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Remive Parent(x) formula limitation

    Parent(x) formula aggregation should be calculate on a sum of time spent column or another formula column

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. grant permission to a structure on user basis

    As an admin I want to be able to grant permission to a structure on a user by user basis. Ideally, I would specify a list of user names. I want to have a more granular user list than project.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Expr Language Documentation Shows Semi-Colons in Formulas, but You Can Use Commas

    All the Expr language documentation shows semi-colons in formulas, but you can use commas. It would be good to indicate this somewhere as many people are in the habit of writing commas inside formulas to separate arguments and it is hard to get into the habit of typing semi-colons just when using a structure formula.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. let the creation of a structure be "templatable"

    For a "new Feature" issue I always have the same structure: draw architecture, add/modify interfaces, implementation, qa, going live...
    How about a Feature to "add a structure by template" that would generate the defined Issues and append the newly created issues as a structure to the current issue.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Tags

    A flat list of items, where each item can be tagged with tags, would be great.

    Item should be filterable on multiple tags.

    The problem with hierarchy is that you tend to waste much time wondering where to put or look for an item.

    Also, often is the case where an item belongs to multiple categories, which is difficult, if not impossible, to represent in a hierarchy.

    The ability to tag an item with multiple tags solves this issue.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Enable Colums to show sum of person days (eg. 101 days) instead of "20w 1d" notation

    As one usually plans on higher levels in bigger amounts of "man days", it would be very helpful to be able to change the columns to this notation for the days and sums of days.
    I know one can change that in the jira administration, but this would affect the whole instance and also smaller issue levels.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 3 4 5 6 8 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Structure for JIRA: Ideas

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base