Skip to content

Structure Team

My feedback

15 results found

  1. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hi,

    Thank you for a great idea! Actually, we are going to add possibility to define jira groups in the user drop-down menu, so you will be able to see hours spent by people from the specific group. According to sprints - good idea, you can use custom period now and define these dates manually.

    Thank you!

    Julia,
    ALM Works team

  2. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hi Mackenzie,

    Thank you for your idea! And what about hierarchy, should we move the issue on the top/bottom of the whole structure?
    According to "Cannot move" problem: it shows because you are trying to move generated rows, like search results. This problem can be resolved by adding special Manual sorter( Sort -> Manual Reordering), it will allow you to change the order manually.

    Thanks you!

    Julia,
    ALM Works Team

  3. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hello,

    It is possible to use root issue for each "sub-hierarchy". Let's say you have structure
    IssueA
    - IssueB
    - Issue C

    and no other issue on the same level with IssueA and would like to use the Issue A value. In this scenario you can create separate formula column, just to "get" the root value, with formula like "parent#depth=1{f}". (depth = 1 is the root level, if automation mode is switched off, f - you formula column A). But in this example, if you have other issue in stryucture, their root will be used, not IssueA.

    Will it help? Please do not hesitate to ask if you have any questions!

    Julia,
    ALM Works Team

  4. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hello,

    thank you for suggestion! As far as I understand, you would like to change the time period for all columns in view settings, am I right? If yes, the period will be changed in all columns, so to compare months you will need to change the month again. Which scenario is more important for you?

    Thanks!

    Julia,
    ALM Works Team

  5. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hi,
    Thank you for suggestion! We are going to implement custom item types, so you will be able to create new types of folders, with Summary and Description. Will it help?

    Thanks!

    Julia
    ALM Works Team

  6. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hello Seth,

    Thank you for your suggestion! There is no way to share column width so far because you can have different monitors and different window sizes, and Structure tries to autosize width for your window.
    By the way, we are working on scrollable mode right now: it will be possible to add more columns without auto-sizing, the horizontal scroll will be shown. Will it help?

    Julia,
    ALM Works Team

  7. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hello Matthias,

    Thank you for your question! We already added aditional modifiers in the version 4.3: https://wiki.almworks.com/x/4w9KAg. Note, that there are several modifiersfor that aggregation: you can include the current row, can exclude it, can count leaves only (check #children, #leaves, #subtree). Will it helps?

    Please do not hesitate to ask if you have any questions!

    Julia,
    ALM Works Team

  8. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hi,

    Thank you for detailed description! It's clear now, but not easy from technical perspective, we will check.
    Please note, that if this data can be counted from your structure (perhaps based on other field), you can use Formula column (https://wiki.almworks.com/x/ILjrAQ), and results for the same items can be different regarding to the position in Structure

    Julia,
    ALM Works team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hello,

    Thanks for sending us feedback! Am I right, that you would like to be able to define different comments for the same issue? We are going to add multiple Notes columns, so you would be able to add several Notes columns and type different text in it. Will it be helpful?

    Thanks!

    Julia,
    ALM Works Team

  9. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Thank you for clarifications, Robin,

    We have such task in our backlog. We cannot provide an ETA as it depends on multiple factors but will let you know when the improvement is delivered.

    Regards,
    Egor

  10. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hi Jason,

    We are working on custom item types right now. In the first implementation it will be something similar to folder, but with possibility to define description. Do you want to be able to add your own specific parameters?
    Also we have Notes column (https://wiki.almworks.com/display/structure/Notes+Column), you can add some comments for specific row (including folders) there.

    Thank you for idea!

    Julia,
    ALM Works Team

  11. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hi,

    Thank you for your suggestion! We created a separate plugin, Colors for JIRA (https://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/com.almworks.jira.colors.colors-plugin/server/overview), which allows you to define JQL for highlighting issue key. It is a great idea to highlight also cells and columns, we will think about it.

    Julia,
    ALM Works Team

  12. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hello Dominic,

    In Structure version 2.8 we introduced the ‘Open’ button at the bottom of the Structure widget on Issue Page - clicking on it will open a structure in full. But this button isn’t shown if Structure widget is collapsed, so please tell us - does this functionality still meet your needs, considering the collapsed state limitation?

    Best regards,
    Stepan Kholodov

  13. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hello Simon,

    I realized that the functionality from my previous answer doesn’t exactly meet your needs - grouping by issue links works the following way: when there is an issue in the structure that is linked to another issue as its child, adding a grouper by the specific link type will add the parent issue to the structure. Technically, it will be added as a group but it’s not going to effect how the hierarchy is displayed.

    Although this is not the grouping you requested, perhaps this feature may be of use to you regardless.

    Apologies for the initial confusion.

    Best regards,
    Stepan Kholodov

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hello Simon,

    Grouping by Issue Links was introduced in Structure 3.5 version: https://wiki.almworks.com/display/structure/Structure+3.5+Release+Notes

    Please feel free to try it!

    Best regards,
    Stepan Kholodov

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hello Simon,

    Thank you for your suggestion! I have passed this idea to our dev team and we’ll see if it’s doable.

    ALM Works

  14. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Hello Roisin,

    In Structure 2.9 we introduced a second Structure panel. If an issue is clicked on in the structure, its Issue Details page will open on the right, making it possible to view or edit issues right in the structure.
    https://wiki.almworks.com/display/structure/Viewing+Issue+Details

    Best regards,
    Stepan Kholodov

  15. 22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Structure Team commented  · 

    Thanks for posting this idea!
    Do you expect Structure on Project Page will be always filtered by the same JQL as a Board instead of a Project? Is it more convenient for you to use Project Page instead of Structure Board (https://wiki.almworks.com/display/structure/Structure+Board)?
    Note, that you can create Structure based on your Board using our Agile Inserter (https://wiki.almworks.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=32223422) or special template (Create Structure | Agile Structure)

    Thanks!
    Julia

Feedback and Knowledge Base